Because of this, it can be easy to overlook the fact that the. The SIG P365, Springfield Armory Hellcat, and the Glock 48/43x duo have been getting all the headlines. Given your preference for the glock 19 you would likely be more familiar and comfortable with the glock 26 out of the box, but do not believe that it is in any way, a better firearm and the springfield XD or XDM line. F or the last couple of years, it’s felt like all the attention in the concealed-carry world has focused on increasing capacity in subcompacts. I have never needed an extractor or any other warranty work, and although they do not specify a lifetime warranty, the few cases I have heard of factory defects were taken care of by springfield. heavily recommend tulster holsters if you like clamshell IWB holsters for that task. I have never had a problem finding a good holster for any of them. I have carried springfields exclusively ever since I retired my Ruger SR9c from that position about 5 years ago. you probably couldn't go wrong with either choice as both are reliable and accurate pieces, considering the size. I’ll probably just stick to my Glock 26 for my subcompact needs.I personally have never liked gwocks, but I have have heavily enjoyed the springfield lineups. Me? I don’t see myself rushing out to buy one anytime soon. 9.Īs for the X.D.S.: if you can get past the stinging feeling when you fire it and you’re looking for a subcompact. a shot to see how it handles, and I’d also like to see if comfort is an issue with an X.D.S. While being uncomfortable is not an impediment to a trained shooter, it certainly does not hurt to have a pistol with which you’re comfortable. Having said that…it is very uncomfortable to shoot. Even with my discomfort, I was able to perform adequately. All of my headshots were on target and fairly tightly grouped. After firing just fifty rounds, I had to shake my hands a bit to try and lose the stinging sensation.Īs you can see, at 21 feet (I’m not sure I personally would engage somebody beyond 21 feet with a subcompact pistol…some may disagree with this), all of my rounds are in the 8 ring or better, and my worst shot was just on the 8 side of the 8/7 border. That last quality, which grants it its ergonomic qualities, is also its largest drawback. 45, it’s a combination of it being a subcompact pistol, the caliber, and the extremely thin grip. I immediately learned that a handgun that size is rarely comfortable to fire. It had an extremely stiff trigger, and I noticed that it stung the palms of my hands after extended firing. His handgun of choice was a small Kahr handgun. I was in Florida, visiting my grandparents, when he decided to take us to the shooting range. My first exposure to subcompact pistols came from my grandfather. Some people aren’t bothered that that, but I am, and that I was able to wrap my hand around the entire pistol grip with the extension in place pleased me. One of my gripes with my Glock 26 is that I had to purchase aftermarket magazine extensions so my pinky finger isn’t hanging off the pistol. Speaking of my large hands, I love the magazine extension. Then again, I have large hands, so your mileage may vary. I did not have a single failure to fire due to not gripping the pistol hard enough. For that matter, I had no problem with the grip safety, either. It was smooth enough with a pronounced reset. I had no trouble with the trigger pull, either. I could have easily stuck it in my pocket without anyone noticing were it my own (which I would not recommend without a pocket holster). It also had a fiber optic front sight, which helps with target acquisition. Out the gate, I noticed that it was extremely ergonomic. I wanted to choose for myself, and I was doing research into striker-fired. These are criticisms I often see from fellow Glock carriers. that can’t be found in other striker-fired pistols. On the other hand, many have criticized its grip safety as an unnecessary impediment to firing and potentially a factor that could cost someone in a time-is-life situation. dropped way back when in the early 2000s, I remember seeing an ad in either Soldier of Fortune or a gun magazine that bragged how it carried a then-near unparalleled 13 rounds of. I can’t find the advertisement, but when the X.D. Its proponents swear by them up and down, citing their reliability, ergonomics, and, in the full sized versions, its magazine capacity. series of pistols tends to stir up debate amongst gun owners. With that out of the way, the Springfield X.D. Thus, even though Springfield markets the pistol without abbreviation periods, I shall be using them for clarity purposes. Before we launch into the review…in my SIG P320 review, I don’t know if it was my phone or if it was WordPress, but every instance of X.D.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |